GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS
Mr. John Williams (St. Albert, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Speaker, the
information commissioner has been bullied around by the government but,
fortunately, he has not bowed out. The auditor general is being swept aside
as if his reports were not important, but they are. We hear from HRDC about
the thousands of grant applications that have been handled incompetently
with money being used questionably. We see, from the auditor general on the
CIDA grants, that here a $6.3 million contract was approved contrary to the
rules.
Is there nothing that this Prime Minister will not do to help his friends?
Right Hon. Jean Chrétien (Prime Minister, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would like
to say at this moment that when a person is in public administration all
sorts of problems can occur.
Because the Leader of the Opposition was a senior minister from Alberta, I
would like to refer to what the report of the auditor general of Alberta
said specifically about human resources. It showed that human resources
programs were always a challenge for any government. I am sure the
Government of Alberta appreciates the report issued last week by the auditor
general on the human resources and employment departments.
In looking at the departments' skills development program, the auditor found
evidence of significant overpayments. He also found that the control within
the departments were not adequate to ensure proper record keeping -
Comment:
The Prime Minister is exactly right, "human resources programs were always a
challenge for any government." That is one of the practical reasons why the
Biblical model of society teaches that "human resources" should be the
responsibility of the family and the church, not of the state. If people
obeyed the Bible, they wouldn't have had to embark on the massive social
experiment of the last half century with its horrible legacy of human
tragedy. Having admitted that "human resources" are a challenge for the
civil magistrate and, therefore, one at which they aren't always successful,
the PM has to believe that the family and the church would do an even worse
job if he is not prepared to return this jurisdiction to them. If he doesn't
believe that, he has no rationale for not surrendering political
responsibility over "human resources." If he does hold such a disrespectful
view of the abilities of families and the church, he doesn't deserve to lead
this country.
|